Archive for March, 2010

Mar
29
2010

How to dress for a robbery

by Andrea

Ok, so here’s one thing I don’t get: dressing babies up. Unless you’re dressing them up like animals, which is funny. Another exception is dressing baby boys up like college professors, which is adorable and funny.

But seriously. Jewelry for babies? Imagine trying to explain that one in the emergency room.

“The x-ray shows a tiny bracelet caught in the small intestine.”

“Well you see doc, even though she can’t walk yet, I thought she needed a charm bracelet. And earrings. And high heels.”

Here’s another thing I don’t understand: attaching ginorm flowers to a baby’s head. I mean, a bow or a headband? Fine. But when the flower or marabou pouf is bigger than the baby’s face? It’s ridiculous. Also, it might result in lopsided neck muscles. Or self-esteem issues. You know all the other babies are laughing.

I know this criticism is a little rich coming from a childless woman with an entire dresser drawer devoted to dog clothing. But my dogs are A: not human infants, and B: um… I got nothing. There’s no excuse for dressing my dogs in seasonally themed outfits, other than that it’s funny and I get a kick out it. Besides, they don’t mind.

See? They love it.

This is all precipitated by reading the blog of a girl I know who posted photos of her newborn wearing a tutu, a headflower, and several items of jewelry. I feel comfortable writing about this publicly, because she is not the only girl I know who posts photos of her baby in ridiculous costumes. So relax. This isn’t about YOU. YOUR baby’s tutu is tasteful.

I’m looking at these pictures and feeling sorry for the baby (who was adorable, by the way), because I’ll bet Mom’s going to be pissed when that kid develops enough muscle tone to rip off that silly headgear. And I was laughing, because I’m kind of a bitch. There, I said it, so you don’t have to. Kurt came to see what I was laughing about, so I showed him the pictures, but he didn’t think they were that funny.

“If I had a baby I’d probably put it in stupid outfits too,” he said.

“Like what?”"

“Like how to dress for a robbery.”

“I’m sorry?”

“You know, put the baby in pantyhose. A baby with pantyhose over its face. I did it to Wiscious. I’ll probably do it to a baby.”

The best part is that I know he totally would. He’s gonna be such a great dad.

Mar
22
2010

Andrea Staats Paper Company

by Andrea

I won’t really call it that. That’s just a working title. And that’s what I’ve been doing. Learning how to print. And guess what? It’s really, really hard. So you owe your computer printer a kiss and a hug, because you who have never set type have no idea.

It’s not easy but it’s fun, and I’m having a ball learning how to read backwards and getting all inky. And guess what? Sesame Street can help me show you what I’ve been doing! Except the presses I’m using aren’t as um, technologically advanced. Wouldn’t you like to buy a thank you card printed on a 104-year-old printing press? I THOUGHT SO!

via Friends Make Prints

Mar
14
2010

The trouble with Toby

by Andrea

“You should be nice to him. He’s a nice cat.”

“Not when he’s biting me!”

“He bites you because you bother him.”

“Yeah, but I don’t bite him when he bothers me.”

Mar
11
2010

Spoiler Alert

by Andrea

I really, really, really wanted to love this movie. I didn’t.

First, a word about 3D. I’m like a cat: I don’t like loud noises, sudden movements, or baths. Just kidding. I like baths, but I’m serious about the sudden movements part, which is why 3D is sort of an iffy proposition for me. I don’t like it when things come sailing towards my face. I just don’t. Alice’s tumble down the rabbit hole was intense in this respect, and I kept flinching as she kept falling and falling and falling until Kurt leaned over and whispered, “Just shut one eye and then it’s 2D.” Well duh. I knew that. But thanks for reminding me.

This film doesn’t follow the book, which was an interesting take that worked well. We’re all familiar with what happens to Alice in Wonderland the first time around. The second time around, she’s almost 20 years old, and falls down the rabbit hole after she runs away (literally) from a marriage proposal. Wonderland has taken a turn for the worst since her last visit, and it’s up to Alice to slay the Jabberwocky and restore Wonderland to the White Queen’s rule.

Thanks to the impeccable acting, art direction and CGI, I was enjoying the film right up until the Jabberwocky opened its mouth and words came out. Why did they feel the need to anthropomorphize the Jabberwocky? The Jabberwocky is meant to be a symbol, not an entity with thoughts and feelings. I have to admit that it was satisfying to see Alice in a suit of armor, slaying the dragon, but it was weird that the dragon talked. Just sayin’.

Then Alice returns to her world and argh! The last five minutes of the film were trite and horrible and I’m angry, angry I say! It was like they were tired and wanted to go home and that was the best ending they could come up with. It wasn’t so much what happened in the ending but how it happened. I could describe in several paragraphs my many problems with the ending, but I won’t. I don’t want to spoil the movie for you, especially since it spoils itself so very well.

Mar
6
2010

Ouchie

by Andrea

Let’s play a game called Guess Who Has a Terrible Toothache and No Dental Insurance?!

If you guessed Andrea Staats, you win. The prize is… um, there’s no prize. Sorry. Thanks for playing.

This is what I get for waking up in the middle of the night and eating chocolate-raspberry cookies (delicious!) and then going back to bed without brushing my teeth. Just desserts, pun intended.

There’s really no point to this post other than to garner sympathy and helpful DIY dental tips. That is all.

Mar
5
2010

In which I review movies that are already on DVD

by Andrea

Meh. I expected more from this film. It was waaaay too long, and I have a well-documented hatred of long movies. I added it to my Netflix queue because I have a little crush on Aziz Ansari, but he was only in the movie for about 2 minutes. I wanted more Aziz, Aubrey Plaza, and the hilarious Jason Schwartzman, and a lot less Seth Rogen. And even less Eric Bana.

I’ll see anything with Ricky Gervais. He just might be the funniest man alive. Jennifer Garner was adorable, as usual, and I want to be Tina Fey when I grow up. It was clever and funny, but the previews made it seem like a romantic comedy… which it is. More than that, however, it’s a trenchant satire on religion. I’m betting a lot of people sitting in the theatre were like, “Whoa, I did NOT see that coming!” And then they got really uncomfortable and personally offended. If you have a sense of humor about religion and the nutty things people believe, see it. Otherwise, it will probably just upset you. Seriously.

Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci and Jane Lynch (Jane Lynch!) were wonderful. Streep was amazing as Julia Child, and perfectly captured her joie de vivre. Amy Adams was cute and charming, as usual. And yet I’m underwhelmed.

I can’t quite put my finger on why I didn’t love it. There wasn’t enough food, if that makes sense. It didn’t capture the sensuality of food like Chocolat, Mostly Martha, Like Water for Chocolate, or Babette’s Feast. It was hard to believe that Amy Adams eats at all, let alone enjoys it. I didn’t even feel hungry after watching it.

Here’s what Kurt had to say: “If they had just taken the Julie part out, and added more about Julia, it would have been a good movie.”

I’m inclined to agree. So there you are. One hit, two misses. Off to watch Extract.